Current research projects
My research is in the field of evolutionary ecology, particularly
the ecology and evolution of reproductive strategies in flowering plants.
There are over 250,000 described species of flowering plants and much
of this diversity involves variation in reproductive strategies. In
particular, most flowering plant species (ca. 75%) are hermaphroditic,
that is, flowers have both stamens that produce pollen grains (male
function) and a pistil that contains ovules to be fertilized (female
function). However, in the remaining (ca. 25%) species, flowers or plants
exhibit some form of gender specialization. For example, monoecious
plants allocate to both male and female functions, but the sexual functions
are spatially separated into male and female flowers. In contrast, dioecious
species have separate genders in the form of male and female plants.
A female plant would have flowers with a pistil but no stamens, and
the opposite would be true for a male plant. Even within hermaphroditic
species, individual plants can differ dramatically in their allocation
to female versus male function. I'm particularly interested in:
1) Understanding what factors determine the allocation of resources
to male function (pollen number and size, nectar and petals
that attract pollinators and thus lead to the dispersal of pollen to
other flowers) as opposed to female function (ovule number,
seed number and size). Theoretical models, known collectively as sex
allocation theory, make predictions about gender allocation patterns
in flowering plants. However, there have been few empirical tests of
the assumptions and predictions of these models. In collaboration with
Dr. S. Mazer at UCSB, we are examining the environmental and genetic
sources of variation in gender expression in sister species of the genus
Clarkia (Onagraceae).
2) Understanding how breeding systems (inbreeding versus outcrossing)
and plant-pollinator interactions affect gender allocation patterns.
Selfing (mating with self in hermaphroditic individuals) has
both costs and benefits. The most obvious cost is the expression of
lethal or harmful recessive alleles (i.e., inbreeding depression). The
most obvious benefit is the ability to reproduce when pollinators or
mates are scarce (i.e., the reproductive assurance hypothesis). Selfing
has evolved repeatedly in flowering plants and I'm interested in understanding
what factors favor the evolution or maintenance of selfing and how selfing
affects sex allocation strategies.
3) Understanding how phylogenetic (i.e., historical) and developmental
constraints affect plant reproductive strategies. In some plant
families like the Cucurbitaceae (the cucumber and squash family), there
is a definite architecture associated with flower production. For example,
in many cultivated cucurbits, male flowers are produced first along
the main branch, while female flowers are produced either at later nodes
or on secondary branches. If such patterns reflect phylogenetic or developmental
constraints on sex expression, they must influence gender allocation.
How important are these constraints? Few studies of wild species have
addressed this question.
4) Developing resource management plans for a local nature preserve.
Understaffed and underfinanced, small nature preserves face
numerous issues related to resource management. With the support of
a National Science Foundation grant, I am mentoring a number of projects
that focus on forest regeneration and control of invasive species.
REU
Program
Current Grants